If you wish to find resources published during Austen's time, such as book reviews, you may want to look at periodicals from the period. We have a vast collection in the Library (you may need to ask to see some, as they may be locked up due to being old and fragile) and many have been digitized by other institutions, as well.
Use the indexes below to find relevant articles. Then, we can track down the full-text. Please let me (Amanda Graves; agraves@drew.edu) know if you need help with this! It can be tricky, so don't try not to feel bad if you get confused.
All of the information presented here will work when using ScholarSearch and other EBSCO databases. Wildcards and truncation can also be used in non-EBSCO databases, but the symbols may differ. To find more information about advanced searching techniques for the database you're using, look for a "Help" button or try doing a Google search for "[database name] wildcards" to find a guide. If you get stuck, please reach out to a librarian for help!
Truncation and wildcard guides for some of the most common databases are linked in this section.
When you're researching a topic, do you find yourself rephrasing your search over and over again, getting new, relevant sources each time? If so, consider searching with subject headings!
Subject headings are different from keywords. Subject headings are used to group materials (like books and articles) based on their topic so that they can be searched and retrieved together, regardless of the original language of the work or the keywords used in the title. The most widely-used approved list of standardized subject headings is Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH).
Frequently, the library catalog uses terms that are very different from the keywords you may come up with on your own. For example, if you're researching "test tube babies," you won't get many results by using that phrase. You'll get many more matches if you search using the LCSH "Fertilization in vitro, Human".
By using subject headings, you no longer need to think of a near-endless amount of synonyms for your research topic, such as popular vs. technical variations (salt/sodium), different linguistic origins (sweat/perspiration), generic vs. brand names (tissues/Kleenex), dialectical variants (flashlights/torches), lexical variants, abbreviations vs. full forms, acronyms, common misspellings, or near synonyms!
Once you find relevant LCSHs, you can use them to search in both Locate and ScholarSearch.
In our ongoing effort to provide a diverse and inclusive range of resources, we want to inform you that our catalog may contain Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) that are offensive, outdated, or insensitive. These subject headings are reflective of historical cataloging practices and may include biases or language that were deemed acceptable at the time of their creation but are considered harmful today.
We recognize that societal attitudes and language evolve, and certain terms may not align with contemporary standards of inclusivity and sensitivity. It's important to note that we do not endorse or support discriminatory language; rather, we aim to preserve the integrity of historical records while being mindful of changing perspectives.
We encourage users to approach these materials with a critical perspective, recognizing that the presence of certain language or terminology does not reflect the values or viewpoints of the Drew University Library faculty and staff. If you have concerns about specific content or subject headings, we welcome your feedback to help us continually improve and update our cataloging practices. Please email us at reference@drew.edu and we will get back to you as soon as possible!
We appreciate your understanding and cooperation as we strive to maintain an environment that is inclusive and respectful to all!
If you’re comparing two or more pieces, you may have a tough time finding sources that discuss everything you need. Instead of finding one source that covers everything, you may need to find multiple sources and put them into conversation with one another. Don’t just summarize the pieces. Demonstrate the relationship between them. How are they connected?
What is the author’s point?
What kind of proof or approaches do they use?
What perspective or ideology is guiding their thinking? What lenses are they looking through? (feminist, Marxist, psychoanalytic, etc.)?
How do context and the author's background shape their argument?
How does the work fit in with other research? Does it challenge older interpretations or reinforce them?
Questions? Need Help? Email reference@drew.edu
Drew University Library, https://drew.edu/academic/student-resources/library/